Open source alternatives to Webflow

By GitHub stars it is Webstudio, with 9,169 stars and a commit on 13 Nov. Choose Webstudio when you want a similar visual builder but own the code and hosting: you can export and self-host for free, and its Pro plan costs $20 a month. Next come Ycode (338 stars).

Yes. The code of all 2 is public under AGPL 3.0 or MIT, so you can use them with no licence fee. Running one yourself costs the server and your time to look after it, and some makers also sell a hosted plan.

Start from the job you use Webflow for. Choose Ycode when you want a Webflow-style builder with a CMS for less; it is free to self-host, and Cloud Basic costs $15 a month.

All 2: Webstudio and Ycode. Each tool's page says what it needs to run.

All 2 we track had a commit in the last 30 days, among them Webstudio and Ycode. A recent commit shows the project is kept up, not that it will stay that way.

AGPL 3.0 (1), MIT (1). MIT, BSD and Apache let you change and reuse the code freely. GPL and AGPL ask you to share your changes under the same licence when you give the software to others, and AGPL also counts letting people use it over a network.

The hosting. Webflow's maker runs the servers for you; with an open source tool the updates, backups, security fixes and support are yours, unless you take the maker's hosted plan. Features differ too, so check what each one imports and exports before you move your data.