Open source real-time infrastructure monitoringOpen source alternatives to Dash0
11 open source tools do the job of Dash0. The most starred is Netdata, with 81.3k stars. Verified on GitHub. About Dash0

Dash0Freemium
Netdata81.3k stars · GPL 3.0 or laterGitHubAll 11 alternatives
Questions about alternatives to Dash0
What is the best open source alternative to Dash0?
By GitHub stars it is Netdata, with 81,384 stars and a commit on 13 Nov. Choose Netdata when you want per-second metrics kept on your own servers, with a free agent instead of a bill for every signal sent. Next come Grafana (77,874 stars) and Prometheus (67,596 stars).
Is there a free alternative to Dash0?
Yes. The code of all 11 is public under GPL 3.0 or later, AGPL 3.0, Apache 2.0 or MIT, so you can use them with no licence fee. Running one yourself costs the server and your time to look after it, and some makers also sell a hosted plan.
How do I choose between them?
Start from the job you use Dash0 for. Choose Grafana Loki when you only need log storage and want to run it yourself on inexpensive object storage, with no per-signal bill. Choose Grafana when telemetry must stay on your own servers and one dashboard should mix 150+ data sources, not one vendor's store.
Which Dash0 alternatives can I host on my own server?
All 11: Netdata, Grafana, Prometheus, SigNoz, Grafana Loki, Apache SkyWalking, OpenObserve, VictoriaMetrics and 3 more. Each tool's page says what it needs to run.
Which ones are still being worked on?
All 11 we track had a commit in the last 30 days, among them Netdata, Grafana, Prometheus and SigNoz. A recent commit shows the project is kept up, not that it will stay that way.
What licences do they use?
Apache 2.0 (5), AGPL 3.0 (3), MIT (2), GPL 3.0 or later (1). MIT, BSD and Apache let you change and reuse the code freely. GPL and AGPL ask you to share your changes under the same licence when you give the software to others, and AGPL also counts letting people use it over a network.
What do I lose by leaving Dash0?
The hosting. Dash0's maker runs the servers for you; with an open source tool the updates, backups, security fixes and support are yours, unless you take the maker's hosted plan. Features differ too, so check what each one imports and exports before you move your data.









