What is Grok 4.7?
Grok 4.7 is a closed reasoning model from xAI, which now signs its docs as SpaceXAI. It uses a new, larger base model than Grok 4.6 and a longer reinforcement learning run on tasks that take hours, and xAI says it checks its own work more carefully and handles long context better. It reads text and images, writes text, works across a 500K-token context with four effort levels, and its knowledge stops at May 2026.
It is xAI's current flagship: the model its docs recommend for code and chat, the default in Grok Build, and available in Cursor and through OpenRouter, Vercel and Cloudflare. Grok 4.6 is still served at the same price.
What changed from Grok 4.6?
A bigger base model and longer training at the same price: xAI says it works longer on hard tasks and checks its own work more carefully.
- Base model
- A new, larger base model, trained longer with reinforcement learning on tasks that take many hours.
- Coding scores
- CursorBench 4.0 rises from 40.4% to 46.3%, and Terminal-Bench 4.0 from 20.3% to 37.6%, with 4.7 at xhigh effort and 4.6 at high.
- Office work scores
- GDPval rises from 1605 to 1695 Elo, and AA Briefcase v1.1 from 1546 to 1657.
- Price and speed
- Unchanged at $2 / $6 per million tokens, and xAI says it runs at the same speed.
Who is Grok 4.7 best for?
Grok 4.7 is best for coding agents on a budget, legal and electrical engineering work, and teams already using Cursor or Grok Build.
Coding agents on a budget
In xAI's table it beats GPT-5.6 Sol on CursorBench 4.0, 46.3% to 41.7%, at half the input price xAI lists for Sol.
Legal work
It leads xAI's table on the Harvey Legal Agent Benchmark at 19.6%, against 15.8% for Grok 4.6 and 6.7% for Fable 5.1.
Electrical engineering
It tops xAI's EEBench column at 64.0%, ahead of Fable 5.1 at 56.4% and GPT-5.6 Sol at 39.4%.
Cursor and Grok Build users
It is Grok Build's default model and on every Cursor plan, where a Fast variant runs at twice the token price.
What's included with Grok 4.7?
Four effort levels, function calling and structured outputs, image input, xAI's built-in tools, reasoning kept across turns, a US-only endpoint and priority processing.
- Four effort levels
- Reasoning effort runs low, medium, high or xhigh, with high as the default.
- Function calling and structured outputs
- It calls your own tools and returns answers in a fixed format, over the Responses or Chat Completions API.
- Image input
- It reads JPG and PNG images up to 20MiB each, with no limit on how many you send.
- Built-in xAI tools
- Web search and code execution run on xAI's servers for $5 per 1,000 calls, and X search for $5 per 1,000 posts fetched, on top of tokens.
- Reasoning kept across turns
- On the Responses API it always returns its encrypted reasoning, so a multi-turn agent keeps it by passing it back.
- US regional endpoint
- A US-only endpoint keeps inference in the United States for 10% more; only Grok 4.7 and Grok 4.6 run there.
- Priority processing
- Requests can jump the queue for lower latency at twice the standard token rates.
How much does Grok 4.7 cost?
Grok 4.7 costs $2 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens on the xAI API, rising to $4 and $12 once a prompt reaches 200K tokens.
- Cached input $0.50 per million tokens
- 500K-token context, text and image input
- Reasoning effort from low to xhigh, high by default
- Cached input $0.55 per million tokens
- $4.40 / $13.20 once a prompt reaches 200K tokens
- Inference stays in the United States
- Cached input $1.00 per million tokens
- The whole request bills at this rate
Prices are in US dollars. Grok 4.7 runs on the xAI API as grok-4.7 and does not take Batch API requests. Priority processing costs twice the standard rates, and server-side tools cost extra, such as $5 per 1,000 web searches or code runs. Grok 4.7 Fast, the same model on faster hardware, is sold only in Cursor and Grok Build at $4 / $12 per million tokens, billed through those plans. xAI also offers Grok 4.7 to try free in Grok Build. Full pricing on docs.x.ai. We checked these prices on .
How do readers rate Grok 4.7?
No one has rated Grok 4.7 yet. Be the first.
Sign in to rate. One rating per account.
Grok 4.7 pros and cons
It scores well above Grok 4.6 at the same token price, but it uses far more tokens per task and still trails Fable 5.1 and Opus 5.5 on hard coding.
Pros
- Keeps Grok 4.6's $2 / $6 price while scoring higher on every test in xAI's launch table, including Terminal-Bench 4.0 at 37.6% against 20.3%.
- Developers on Hacker News and Reddit call it good value for coding once cost is counted; one measured a front-end build at $12.60 on Grok 4.7 against $35 on GPT-6 Astra.
- Several users like its plain, direct replies, and one lawyer finds it gets to the point faster than Opus 5 in legal research.
- Default limits of 150 requests a second and 50 million tokens a minute suit busy agent pipelines.
Cons
- Many developers report it uses far more tokens and time per task than Grok 4.6, and some went back to 4.6, so the unchanged token price does not mean an unchanged bill.
- xAI's launch table runs Grok 4.7 at xhigh effort against Grok 4.6 at high, and in the same table it trails Fable 5.1 on CursorBench 4.0 (46.3% vs 51.8%) and Terminal-Bench 4.0 (37.6% vs 57.9%).
- Cached input costs $0.50 per million tokens, a quarter of the input price, against $0.20 on Claude Sonnet 5 and Opus 5.5, which adds up in long agent loops.
- No Batch API and text-only output, and a prompt of 200K tokens or more bills the whole request at double rates.
What are the best Grok 4.7 alternatives?
Four tools on Recaply do Grok 4.7's job. Ring-2.6-1T is open source, so you can run it on your own server.
Choose Claude Sonnet 5 for long agent loops and long prompts: cache reads cost $0.20 per million tokens against $0.50 here, and its 1M-token context bills at a flat $2 / $10.
Choose it when coding quality matters more than price: Anthropic reports 57.8% on CursorBench 4.0 against 46.3% for Grok 4.7 in xAI's table, at $4 / $20 per million tokens.
Choose Grok 4.3 for high-volume or batch work: it costs $1.25 / $2.50 per million tokens, reads a 1M-token context and takes Batch API jobs at 20% off.
Choose it when you want open weights with two reasoning effort levels for agent work, not xAI's hosted model.
Questions about Grok 4.7
What is Grok 4.7 Fast?
It is the same Grok 4.7 model on faster infrastructure, with about twice the output speed at twice the price: $4 / $12 per million tokens, or $6 / $18 for long prompts. It is sold only in Cursor and Grok Build, billed through those plans, not on the xAI API.
Who is Grok 4.7 for?
Grok 4.7 is best for coding agents on a budget, legal and electrical engineering work, and teams already using Cursor or Grok Build.
Is Grok 4.7 free?
Not on the API, where it costs $2 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens. xAI says you can try it free in Grok Build, its coding agent, though Grok Build's free tier does not include the faster Grok 4.7 Fast.
How much does Grok 4.7 cost?
Grok 4.7's paid plans are Prompts under 200K tokens at $2.00 / $6.00 per million input / output tokens, US regional endpoint at $2.20 / $6.60 per million input / output tokens and Prompts of 200K tokens or more at $4.00 / $12.00 per million input / output tokens.
Is there an open source alternative to Grok 4.7?
Yes. Ring-2.6-1T is an open source tool that does the same job, so you can run your own.
What are the best Grok 4.7 alternatives?
The closest alternatives on Recaply are Claude Sonnet 5, Claude Opus 5.5, Grok 4.3 and Ring-2.6-1T.
Where can I try Grok 4.7?
On its official website, docs.x.ai.
Is Grok 4.7 better than Grok 4.6?
On xAI's own tests, yes: it scores higher on every benchmark in the launch table at the same $2 / $6 price, such as 46.3% against 40.4% on CursorBench 4.0. xAI ran Grok 4.7 at xhigh effort and Grok 4.6 at high, so compare tokens per task on your own work.
Is Grok 4.7 in the Grok app?
xAI's docs list the xAI API, Grok Build, Cursor, and the OpenRouter, Vercel and Cloudflare gateways as the places Grok 4.7 runs. The Grok chat app on grok.com and phones is not on that list.
How up to date is Grok 4.7's knowledge?
Its knowledge stops at May 2026. For anything newer, turn on xAI's Web Search or X Search tools, which cost $5 per 1,000 searches or X posts fetched on top of token charges.
Our verdict
Grok 4.7 is the Grok to use now, and cheap for coding agents as long as you watch the token count.
xAI's own table has it ahead of Grok 4.6 on every test at the same $2 / $6, and ahead of GPT-5.6 Sol on CursorBench 4.0, though Fable 5.1 and Opus 5.5 still lead on hard coding.
- Skip it for
- Batch jobs, which it does not accept, and hard coding work where Fable 5.1 and Opus 5.5 score far higher.
- Check first
- Measure cost per task on your own work, since developers report it uses far more tokens than Grok 4.6.







