Skip to content

DirectoryOpen alternatives

Open source alternatives to Qwen-Image-3.0

2 open source tools do the job of Qwen-Image-3.0. The most starred is GLM-Image, with 1k stars. Verified on GitHub. About Qwen-Image-3.0

Qwen-Image-3.0 homepage
Qwen-Image-3.0Freemium
GLM-Image homepage
GLM-Image1k stars · MITGitHub

All 2 alternatives

Questions about alternatives to Qwen-Image-3.0

What is the best open source alternative to Qwen-Image-3.0?

By GitHub stars it is GLM-Image, with 1,079 stars and a commit on 20 Mar. Choose GLM-Image when you want open weights under the MIT licence or the lowest API price, at $0.015 per image from Z.ai. Next come ERNIE-Image (518 stars).

Is there a free alternative to Qwen-Image-3.0?

Yes. The code of all 2 is public under MIT or Apache 2.0, so you can use them with no licence fee. Running one yourself costs the server and your time to look after it, and some makers also sell a hosted plan.

How do I choose between them?

Start from the job you use Qwen-Image-3.0 for. Choose ERNIE-Image when you need text-to-image you can self-host and fine-tune, not a hosted model billed per image.

Which Qwen-Image-3.0 alternatives can I host on my own server?

All 2: GLM-Image and ERNIE-Image. Each tool's page says what it needs to run.

Which ones are still being worked on?

0 of the 2 we track had a commit in the last 30 days. The quietest is GLM-Image, last changed on 20 Mar. A recent commit shows the project is kept up, not that it will stay that way.

What licences do they use?

MIT (1), Apache 2.0 (1). MIT, BSD and Apache let you change and reuse the code freely.

What do I lose by leaving Qwen-Image-3.0?

The hosting. Qwen-Image-3.0's maker runs the servers for you; with an open source tool the updates, backups, security fixes and support are yours, unless you take the maker's hosted plan. Features differ too, so check what each one imports and exports before you move your data.